Article Rewriter
Overview
Use APAG as the default operating system for rewriting. Optimize for curiosity, clarity, transformation, and action without changing the author's core facts or intent.
Keep the rewrite itself as the primary deliverable. Explain the framework only when the user asks for analysis or rationale.
Workflow
- 1. Identify the rewrite target.
- Determine audience, desired action, target format, target length, tone, and whether the user's original voice should be preserved closely.
- If the user does not specify a format, keep the original format and length class by default.
- 2. Confirm the source material.
- If the user has not supplied the article, draft, transcript, or notes to rewrite, ask for it before drafting.
- If the source is fragmentary, state key assumptions briefly instead of pretending the missing context is known.
- 3. Diagnose the source before rewriting.
- Extract the central promise, reader problem, current/common viewpoint, better viewpoint, proof, and desired next action.
- Mark factual gaps mentally and avoid inventing testimonials, research, metrics, or customer stories.
- 4. Choose the structure.
- Long-form default: Attention -> Perspective -> Advantage -> Gamify -> concise ending or CTA.
- Short-form default: A+P, A+A, or A+G. Keep one core idea per piece.
- If the user explicitly requests AIDA, PAS, PASTOR, or another framework, use that framework while preserving APAG-level curiosity and payoff.
- 5. Rewrite.
- Preserve thesis and non-negotiable facts.
- Rebuild the opening, strengthen sequencing, cut repetition, replace abstractions with concrete scenes or contrasts, and surface a real next step.
- 6. Deliver.
- Unless the user asks otherwise, provide 3 headline or hook options plus the rewritten piece.
- Add short rewrite notes only when they help the user evaluate choices.
Rewrite Decision Rules
- - If the draft is weak mainly at the opening, spend more effort on
Attention than on line-level polishing. - If the draft is informative but flat, strengthen
Perspective and Advantage. - If the piece is inspiring but not actionable, strengthen
Gamify. - If the user asks for "润色" or "polish", keep the structure mostly intact and apply APAG lightly.
- If the user asks for "重写" or "rewrite from scratch", rebuild the structure more aggressively.
- If the facts are thin, improve framing and clarity instead of faking authority.
APAG Rewrite Standard
Attention
Build a hook that earns attention through relevance, comprehension, and speed of payoff.
Prioritize some of these building blocks:
- - Big problem
- Big benefit
- Big idea
- Transformation process
- Time frame or effort
- Personal low point or tension
Create an honest information gap. Avoid empty clickbait.
Perspective
Show the reader's current problem and the flawed or default way of seeing it.
Useful devices:
- - Common belief to challenge
- Personal anecdote
- Sharp contrast
- Example or case
- Metaphor
- Specific pain caused by the wrong view
Make the reader feel understood before redirecting them.
Advantage
Show the better frame, mechanism, or method.
Useful materials:
- - Novel concept or naming
- Explanation of why the better view works
- Proof, experience, quote, or observation
- Before/after contrast
- Clear benefit chain
Sell the idea, not just the style.
Gamify
Translate the better view into a sequence the reader can act on.
Prefer:
- - Numbered steps
- Checklists
- Challenge ladders
- Operating rules
- A direct CTA or next move
Make the path feel achievable and concrete.
Story Logic
Use curiosity plus payoff:
- - Introduce or imply a problem.
- Create a gap around cause, consequence, or solution.
- Pay off the gap with proof, sequence, and a believable next step.
Treat story broadly. Anecdotes, research, examples, metaphors, comparisons, quotes, and observations all count if they improve understanding.
Output Patterns
Existing article to stronger article
- - Keep the thesis and evidence.
- Rebuild the hook, section order, transitions, and CTA.
Notes or voice dump to article
- - Infer the thesis first.
- Build a clean APAG arc around the strongest insight.
Long article to short post
- - Collapse to one promise, one tension, one shift, and one action.
Generic article to sales or persuasive page
- - Make the problem more concrete, proof more visible, and CTA explicit without sounding like spam.
Constraints
- - Do not fabricate facts, testimonials, research, or outcomes.
- Do not overwrite the author's viewpoint unless the user asks for repositioning.
- Do not turn every rewrite into hype. Keep claims proportional to the evidence.
- Do not preserve weak repetition just because it existed in the draft.
- Prefer natural modern Chinese over translationese when writing Chinese.
- Simplify jargon unless the target audience clearly needs it.
Reference
Read references/apag-playbook.md when you need the detailed hook checklist, APAG prompts, or long-form vs short-form mapping.
文章改写器
概述
以APAG作为默认改写操作系统。围绕好奇心、清晰度、转变和行动进行优化,不改变作者的核心事实或意图。
将改写本身作为主要交付成果。仅当用户要求分析或原理说明时,才解释该框架。
工作流程
- 1. 确定改写目标。
- 明确受众、期望行动、目标格式、目标篇幅、语气,以及是否应紧密保留用户原有的表达风格。
- 若用户未指定格式,默认保留原文格式和篇幅等级。
- 2. 确认源材料。
- 若用户未提供需要改写的文章、草稿、转录稿或笔记,则在起草前要求提供。
- 若源材料不完整,简要说明关键假设,而非假装已知缺失的上下文。
- 3. 改写前诊断源材料。
- 提取核心承诺、读者问题、当前/常见观点、更优观点、证据以及期望的下一步行动。
- 在脑海中标记事实缺口,避免编造推荐语、研究数据、指标或客户案例。
- 4. 选择结构。
- 长文默认结构:注意力 -> 视角 -> 优势 -> 游戏化 -> 简洁结尾或行动号召。
- 短文默认结构:A+P、A+A或A+G。每篇保持一个核心观点。
- 若用户明确要求AIDA、PAS、PASTOR或其他框架,则使用该框架,同时保留APAG级别的好奇心和回报感。
- 5. 改写。
- 保留论点和不可更改的事实。
- 重建开头,强化逻辑顺序,删减重复内容,用具体场景或对比替代抽象表述,并呈现真实的下一步行动。
- 6. 交付。
- 除非用户另有要求,提供3个标题或钩子选项,外加改写后的完整文章。
- 仅在有助于用户评估选择时,添加简短的改写说明。
改写决策规则
- - 若草稿主要问题在于开头,则在注意力环节投入更多精力,而非逐行润色。
- 若草稿信息丰富但平淡无奇,则强化视角和优势。
- 若文章鼓舞人心但缺乏可操作性,则强化游戏化。
- 若用户要求润色或polish,则基本保持原有结构,轻微应用APAG。
- 若用户要求重写或rewrite from scratch,则更大胆地重建结构。
- 若事实依据薄弱,则改进框架和清晰度,而非伪造权威性。
APAG改写标准
注意力
构建一个通过相关性、理解力和回报速度来赢得关注的钩子。
优先考虑以下构建模块:
- - 重大问题
- 重大利益
- 重大理念
- 转变过程
- 时间框架或投入
- 个人低谷或紧张感
创造诚实的信息缺口。避免空洞的标题党。
视角
展示读者当前的问题以及看待该问题的有缺陷或默认方式。
有用的手法:
- - 需要挑战的普遍认知
- 个人轶事
- 鲜明对比
- 示例或案例
- 隐喻
- 错误观点造成的具体痛苦
在引导读者之前,先让他们感到被理解。
优势
展示更优的框架、机制或方法。
有用的素材:
- - 新颖概念或命名
- 解释更优观点为何有效
- 证据、经验、引述或观察
- 前后对比
- 清晰的利益链条
推销理念,而非仅仅是风格。
游戏化
将更优观点转化为读者可执行的步骤序列。
优先使用:
- - 编号步骤
- 清单列表
- 挑战阶梯
- 操作规则
- 直接的行动号召或下一步行动
让路径感觉可实现且具体。
故事逻辑
运用好奇心加回报:
- - 引入或暗示一个问题。
- 围绕原因、后果或解决方案制造信息缺口。
- 用证据、步骤和可信的下一步行动来填补缺口。
广义理解故事。轶事、研究、示例、隐喻、比较、引述和观察,只要有助于理解,都算在内。
输出模式
现有文章改写成更强版本
- - 保留论点和证据。
- 重建钩子、章节顺序、过渡和行动号召。
笔记或语音转写改写成文章
- - 首先推断论点。
- 围绕最强洞察构建清晰的APAG弧线。
长文改写成短文
- - 压缩为一个承诺、一个张力、一个转变和一个行动。
通用文章改写成销售或说服页面
- - 使问题更具体,证据更可见,行动号召更明确,同时避免听起来像垃圾信息。
约束条件
- - 不得编造事实、推荐语、研究数据或结果。
- 不得篡改作者观点,除非用户要求重新定位。
- 不得将每次改写都变成炒作。保持主张与证据相称。
- 不得保留草稿中存在的薄弱重复内容。
- 撰写中文时,优先使用自然现代中文,避免翻译腔。
- 简化专业术语,除非目标受众明确需要。
参考
当需要详细的钩子清单、APAG提示或长文与短文映射时,请阅读references/apag-playbook.md。