Personality Analyzer
Analyze a person's personality traits, communication style, and behavioral tendencies based on their written text.
When to Activate
Activate this skill when:
- - The user provides text, messages, or chat logs and asks for a personality reading
- The user wants to understand what someone's writing style reveals about them
- The user asks about communication patterns, emotional tendencies, or character traits
- The user provides a conversation excerpt and asks "what kind of person is this?"
Analysis Framework
Perform a structured personality analysis across these five dimensions:
1. 🗣️ Communication Style
Examine HOW the person expresses themselves:
- - Directness: Are they blunt and to-the-point, or do they hedge and soften?
- Formality level: Formal, casual, or code-switching between both?
- Verbosity: Concise and minimal, or elaborate and detailed?
- Tone: Warm, cold, neutral, enthusiastic, reserved?
- Humor: Do they use jokes, sarcasm, irony, wordplay?
2. 💡 Cognitive Patterns
Examine HOW the person thinks:
- - Logic vs. Emotion: Do they lead with reasoning or feelings?
- Big-picture vs. Detail-oriented: Abstract/conceptual vs. specific/concrete?
- Certainty: Do they use definitive language or qualify everything?
- Curiosity signals: Do they ask questions, explore ideas, show intellectual interest?
- Organization: Is their thinking structured or stream-of-consciousness?
3. 🌡️ Emotional Tendencies
Read the emotional layer beneath the words:
- - Emotional expression: Openly expressive or emotionally guarded?
- Empathy signals: Do they acknowledge others' feelings or stay self-focused?
- Stress/anxiety indicators: Urgency, over-explaining, excessive apologizing?
- Confidence level: Self-assured, uncertain, or seeking validation?
- Emotional stability: Consistent tone or noticeable mood shifts?
4. 🤝 Interpersonal Orientation
Assess how they relate to others:
- - Collaboration vs. Independence: Do they involve others or prefer working solo?
- Power dynamic awareness: Do they position themselves above, equal to, or deferential toward others?
- Trust signals: Open and sharing, or guarded and vague?
- Conflict style: Avoidant, confrontational, diplomatic, or assertive?
- Social awareness: Do they seem attuned to how they're perceived?
5. 🎯 Values & Motivations
Infer what the person cares about:
- - Core priorities: What do they keep returning to in their language?
- Achievement orientation: Goal-driven, process-driven, or people-driven?
- Moral framing: Do they invoke fairness, loyalty, authority, or other values?
- What frustrates them: Complaints and friction points reveal values in reverse
Output Format
Structure the analysis as follows:
CODEBLOCK0
Analysis Guidelines
Do:
- - Anchor every claim to specific words, phrases, or patterns in the text
- Use probabilistic language ("suggests", "tends toward", "may indicate") — avoid stating certainties
- Note when evidence is thin or ambiguous
- Highlight both strengths and potential blind spots
- Consider alternative interpretations when the evidence is mixed
Don't:
- - Make clinical diagnoses (no "this person has narcissistic personality disorder")
- Over-extrapolate from very short texts (< 3-4 sentences)
- Ignore context (a customer complaint vs. a love letter call for different readings)
- Project — only analyze what's actually in the text, not what you imagine
- Be unnecessarily harsh or reductive
Text Length Calibration:
- - < 50 words: Give a brief impression only, emphasize high uncertainty
- 50–200 words: Moderate analysis, note gaps
- 200+ words: Full analysis with good confidence
- Multiple messages over time: Note patterns and any inconsistencies across messages
Special Cases
Multiple People in a Conversation
If the user provides a multi-party conversation:
- - Analyze each participant separately
- Note the dynamic between them (power balance, emotional attunement, conflict patterns)
Non-native Language Signals
If the text appears to be written by a non-native speaker:
- - Focus on content and ideas rather than stylistic quirks that may be language artifacts
- Note this caveat explicitly
Professional vs. Personal Text
- - Professional text (emails, reports) is more constrained — read between the lines more carefully
- Personal text (chats, social posts) is more revealing — take it more at face value
Example Invocation
User: "Can you analyze the personality of whoever wrote this?"
Your response: Follow the Output Format above. Lead with the Quick Summary, then go dimension by dimension. Close with the caveats section.
If the user hasn't provided text yet, ask: "Please share the text or messages you'd like me to analyze."
人格分析器
根据个人书面文本分析其人格特质、沟通风格和行为倾向。
何时激活
在以下情况下激活此技能:
- - 用户提供文本、消息或聊天记录,并要求进行人格解读
- 用户想了解某人的写作风格揭示了什么
- 用户询问沟通模式、情绪倾向或性格特征
- 用户提供一段对话摘录并问这是什么样的人?
分析框架
从以下五个维度进行结构化人格分析:
1. 🗣️ 沟通风格
考察此人如何表达自己:
- - 直接性:他们是直言不讳、直击要点,还是含糊其辞、语气委婉?
- 正式程度:正式、随意,还是在两者之间切换?
- 冗长程度:简洁精炼,还是详尽细致?
- 语气:温暖、冷淡、中性、热情、内敛?
- 幽默感:他们是否使用笑话、讽刺、反语、文字游戏?
2. 💡 认知模式
考察此人如何思考:
- - 逻辑与情感:他们以推理还是感受为主导?
- 宏观与细节:抽象/概念性,还是具体/具象性?
- 确定性:他们使用确定性的语言,还是对一切都加以限定?
- 好奇心信号:他们是否提问、探索想法、表现出智力兴趣?
- 组织性:他们的思维是结构化的,还是意识流式的?
3. 🌡️ 情绪倾向
解读文字背后的情感层次:
- - 情绪表达:开放表达还是情感内敛?
- 共情信号:他们是否关注他人感受,还是以自我为中心?
- 压力/焦虑指标:紧迫感、过度解释、过度道歉?
- 自信水平:自信、不确定,还是寻求认可?
- 情绪稳定性:语气一致,还是明显情绪波动?
4. 🤝 人际取向
评估他们如何与他人相处:
- - 合作与独立:他们是否让他人参与,还是更喜欢独自工作?
- 权力动态意识:他们将自己置于他人之上、平等,还是谦卑的位置?
- 信任信号:开放分享,还是谨慎含糊?
- 冲突风格:回避、对抗、外交手腕,还是坚定自信?
- 社交意识:他们似乎在意自己给他人留下的印象吗?
5. 🎯 价值观与动机
推断此人在乎什么:
- - 核心优先事项:他们在语言中反复提及什么?
- 成就取向:目标驱动、过程驱动,还是人际驱动?
- 道德框架:他们是否援引公平、忠诚、权威或其他价值观?
- 什么让他们沮丧:抱怨和摩擦点反向揭示了价值观
输出格式
按以下结构进行分析:
人格分析
快速总结
[2-3句话概括整体人格印象]
沟通风格
[分析并附上文本中的具体例子]
思维方式
[认知风格分析并附文本证据]
情感世界
[情绪倾向及其暗示]
与他人相处方式
[人际风格和社交取向]
价值观
[从语言中推断的核心价值观和动机]
人格类型快照
[可选:如果有助于理解,可映射到常见框架,如大五人格特质、MBTI近似描述——需明确说明这些是近似判断,而非诊断]
重要注意事项
[注明局限性:短文本=置信度较低;文本反映的是某一时刻,而非整个人;文化/情境因素很重要]
分析指南
应做事项:
- - 将每项判断锚定到文本中的具体词语、短语或模式
- 使用概率性语言(表明、倾向于、可能暗示)——避免绝对化表述
- 当证据不足或模棱两可时予以说明
- 同时强调优点和潜在盲点
- 当证据混杂时考虑替代性解释
不应做事项:
- - 做出临床诊断(如此人患有自恋型人格障碍)
- 从极短文本(少于3-4句话)过度推断
- 忽视情境(客户投诉与情书需要不同的解读方式)
- 投射——只分析文本中实际存在的内容,而非你想象的内容
- 不必要地苛刻或简化
文本长度校准:
- - 少于50字:仅给出简要印象,强调高度不确定性
- 50-200字:适度分析,注明信息缺口
- 200字以上:完整分析,置信度较高
- 跨时间的多条消息:注意模式及消息之间的任何不一致之处
特殊情况
对话中的多人
如果用户提供多方对话:
- - 分别分析每位参与者
- 注意他们之间的动态关系(权力平衡、情感协调、冲突模式)
非母语信号
如果文本似乎由非母语者撰写:
- - 关注内容和思想,而非可能源于语言习惯的风格特征
- 明确注明这一注意事项
专业文本与个人文本
- - 专业文本(电子邮件、报告)更受约束——需要更仔细地解读言外之意
- 个人文本(聊天、社交媒体帖子)更具揭示性——可更直接地按字面理解
示例调用
用户:你能分析一下写这段话的人的人格吗?
你的回复:遵循上述输出格式。以快速总结开头,然后逐维度分析。最后以注意事项部分收尾。
如果用户尚未提供文本,请询问:请分享您希望我分析的文本或消息。