Quick Reference
| File | Purpose |
|---|
| INLINECODE0 | Adapt resume to specific job postings |
| INLINECODE1 |
Find why resume isn't getting calls |
|
ats.md | Pass automated screening systems |
|
seniority.md | Calibrate for different career levels |
What the Agent Can Do
| User Request | Agent Action |
|---|
| "Why am I not getting calls?" | Diagnose: match gaps, red flags, weak positioning |
| "Tailor this to [job posting]" |
Extract keywords, reorder, adapt language |
| "Will this pass ATS?" | Check format, keywords, parseability |
| "I'm changing careers" | Identify transferable skills, build narrative bridge |
| "Condense 15 years to 2 pages" | Prioritize recent impact, strategic omissions |
| "Is my experience positioned well?" | Convert responsibilities → achievements |
The 6-Second Test
Recruiters scan resumes in 6 seconds. Before anything else, verify:
- 1. Title clarity — Current/target role obvious at top?
- Impact visible — Top 3 achievements jump out?
- Relevance clear — Match to target role evident?
- Clean format — No visual clutter slowing scan?
If any fail → fix before other optimizations.
Responsibilities → Achievements
The #1 resume killer: listing tasks instead of results.
Transform pattern:
- - "Responsible for..." → "Achieved X resulting in Y"
- "Managed team of..." → "Built team from X to Y, delivering Z"
- "Worked on..." → "Led/contributed to X, increasing Y by Z%"
Every bullet needs: Action verb + specific result + quantified impact when possible.
Tailoring Workflow
When adapting to a specific job:
- 1. Extract requirements — Parse job description for must-haves vs nice-to-haves
- Map experience — Which of user's achievements match each requirement?
- Identify gaps — What's missing? Can it be reframed or is it a real gap?
- Inject keywords — Add exact terms from JD, naturally integrated
- Reorder sections — Most relevant experience first
See tailoring.md for job description parsing patterns.
Career Changers
When user is switching industries/roles:
- 1. Vocabulary translation — Rewrite achievements in target industry language
- Transferable skills — Extract hidden competencies ("budget management" = "P&L ownership")
- Narrative bridge — 2-3 sentences connecting past to future coherently
- Section reorder — Skills/summary may go before experience
- Red flag check — Avoid phrases that signal confusion about direction
See tailoring.md section on industry translation.
Senior/Executive Resumes
15+ years of experience requires different approach:
- 1. Career arc — One coherent progression, not 12 disconnected roles
- Recency weighting — Last 5-7 years detailed, earlier roles condensed
- Strategic omissions — Remove outdated tech, irrelevant roles, age signals
- Leadership evidence — Show HOW you led, not just that you did
- Role calibration — Adjust tone if targeting lower level (avoid "overqualified" rejection)
See seniority.md for condensing techniques.
Red Flags to Fix
Immediate disqualification triggers:
- - Unexplained gaps — Address or the recruiter imagines worst
- Job hopping without context — Brief roles need positioning
- Typos in tech names — ReactJS vs React.js matters
- Generic objective — "Seeking challenging opportunity" = delete
- Skills mismatch — Claims that experience doesn't support
Format Rules
- - Length: <10 years = 1 page, 10-20 = 2 pages, exec = 2-3
- File: Have PDF, DOCX, and plain text versions ready
- Design: One column safer for ATS, minimal color, no graphics
- Dates: Consistent format throughout (MM/YYYY or Month YYYY)
For ATS-specific formatting, see ats.md.
快速参考
| 文件 | 用途 |
|---|
| tailoring.md | 针对特定职位调整简历 |
| diagnosis.md |
找出简历未获面试的原因 |
| ats.md | 通过自动筛选系统 |
| seniority.md | 针对不同职业阶段进行校准 |
助手能做什么
| 用户请求 | 助手操作 |
|---|
| 为什么我接不到面试电话? | 诊断:匹配差距、危险信号、定位薄弱 |
| 针对[职位描述]调整简历 |
提取关键词、重新排序、调整语言 |
| 这份简历能通过ATS吗? | 检查格式、关键词、可解析性 |
| 我正在转行 | 识别可迁移技能、构建叙事桥梁 |
| 将15年经验压缩到2页 | 优先展示近期影响、战略性省略 |
| 我的经验定位是否合理? | 将职责转化为成就 |
6秒测试
招聘人员扫描简历只需6秒。在此之前,请先验证:
- 1. 职位清晰度 — 当前/目标职位是否在顶部一目了然?
- 影响力可见 — 前3项成就是否突出?
- 相关性明确 — 与目标职位的匹配是否明显?
- 格式整洁 — 是否有视觉杂乱影响扫描?
任何一项不达标 → 先修复再进行其他优化。
职责 → 成就
简历的头号杀手:罗列任务而非结果。
转换模式:
- - 负责…… → 实现了X,带来了Y
- 管理团队…… → 将团队从X扩展到Y,交付了Z
- 参与…… → 领导/贡献了X,使Y提升了Z%
每一条都需要: 动作动词 + 具体结果 + 尽可能量化的影响。
调整工作流程
针对特定职位调整时:
- 1. 提取要求 — 解析职位描述,区分必备项与加分项
- 匹配经验 — 用户的哪些成就符合每项要求?
- 识别差距 — 缺少什么?能否重新表述,还是真正的短板?
- 注入关键词 — 添加职位描述中的确切术语,自然融入
- 重新排序板块 — 最相关的经验放在前面
职位描述解析模式详见 tailoring.md。
转行人士
当用户正在转换行业/职位时:
- 1. 词汇转换 — 用目标行业语言重写成就
- 可迁移技能 — 提取隐藏能力(预算管理 = 损益表掌控)
- 叙事桥梁 — 用2-3句话连贯地连接过去与未来
- 板块重排 — 技能/摘要可能放在经验之前
- 危险信号检查 — 避免暗示方向混乱的表述
行业转换部分详见 tailoring.md。
资深/高管简历
15年以上经验需要不同方法:
- 1. 职业轨迹 — 一条连贯的晋升路径,而非12个互不关联的职位
- 近期权重 — 近5-7年详细描述,早期职位精简
- 战略性省略 — 删除过时技术、无关职位、年龄信号
- 领导力证据 — 展示你如何领导,而非仅仅说明你领导过
- 职位校准 — 若目标职位较低,调整语气(避免资历过高的拒绝)
精简技巧详见 seniority.md。
需修复的危险信号
直接导致淘汰的触发因素:
- - 无法解释的空窗期 — 需说明,否则招聘人员会往最坏处想
- 无背景说明的频繁跳槽 — 短期职位需要定位
- 技术名称拼写错误 — ReactJS与React.js有区别
- 通用型求职目标 — 寻求有挑战的机会 = 删除
- 技能不匹配 — 声称的技能与经验不符
格式规则
- - 篇幅: <10年 = 1页,10-20年 = 2页,高管 = 2-3页
- 文件: 准备好PDF、DOCX和纯文本版本
- 设计: 单栏更利于ATS,少用颜色,无图形
- 日期: 全篇格式一致(MM/YYYY或Month YYYY)
针对ATS的格式要求,详见 ats.md。