US-Iran War Situation Tracker Skill

This skill provides a focused methodology for gathering and verifying real-time intelligence on the US-Iran conflict. It is tailored to navigate the specific information landscape of this war, prioritizing actionable intelligence over general news.

Core Principle: Assume Disinformation & Triangulate

In this high-stakes conflict, all primary sources (both US/allies and Iran/allies) have a strong agenda. Information should only be considered credible after triangulation: corroboration by sources from an opposing side or confirmation by a reputable, neutral third party (like a major news agency).

3-Step Intelligence Cycle for the US-Iran War

Step 1: Define Intelligence Needs & Specific Keywords

A strict 6-hour time filter is mandatory for all searches. This skill is for near-real-time tracking, not historical analysis.

Entity & Event Keywords:

• * Involved Parties: US military, CENTCOM, Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Hezbollah, INLINECODE5
• Geographic Locations: Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, Red Sea, Indian Ocean, Tehran, Tel Aviv, Ali Al Salem Air Base (Kuwait), INLINECODE13
• Military Hardware & Operations: IRIS Dena, Thaad system, ballistic missile, suicide drone, F-35, torpedo attack, INLINECODE20
• Key Personnel: Pete Hegseth (US Secretary of Defense), Abbas Araghchi (Iranian Foreign Minister)

Search Query Strategy:

• * Action-Specific: INLINECODE23
• Location-Specific: INLINECODE24
• Official Statements: site:defense.gov "Iran", site:en.mfa.ir "United States", INLINECODE27
• Multi-lingual: Search key terms in English, Farsi (جنگ ایران و آمریکا), and Hebrew (מלחמת איראן-ארצות הברית) to capture local perspectives.

Step 2: Consult Tiered Authoritative Sources for This Conflict

Prioritize sources based on their proximity to the events and their established neutrality.

Tier	Source Type	Specific Examples for This Conflict	Purpose & How to Use
1A	US & Allies Primary Sources	INLINECODE30, centcom.mil, idf.il, INLINECODE33	For official US/Israeli claims, statements, and footage. Treat as a claim to be verified.
1B

Iran & Allies Primary Sources | en.mfa.ir, IRNA.ir, Tasnim News Agency, Press TV | For official Iranian/allied claims and counter-claims. Treat as a claim to be verified. |
| 2 | Global News Agencies | Reuters, Associated Press (AP), AFP | Crucial for triangulation. These agencies often have correspondents on the ground and are the first to provide independently verified reports. Use them to confirm or deny claims from Tier 1 sources. |
| 3 | Specialized & International Media | Al Jazeera, BBC News, The Guardian, New York Times | For in-depth analysis, context, and reports on secondary effects (e.g., civilian casualties, diplomatic efforts). Good for understanding the "why" behind the "what." |
| 4 | International & Humanitarian Orgs | un.org (UN News), icrc.org (Red Cross), amnesty.org | For information on civilian impact, human rights, and potential war crimes. |

Step 3: Synthesize & Report with Attribution

When presenting the findings, structure is key to clarity.

1. 1. Lead with Verified Facts: Start with information confirmed by Tier 2 sources or acknowledged by both sides.
2. Present Competing Claims: Clearly separate uncorroborated claims, attributing them properly. Use phrasing like: "The US military claimed... while Iran's state media reported..." or "According to a statement from the IDF..."
3. Structure by Theme: Organize the report into logical sections:

* Key Military Developments (Verified) * Official Statements & Claims (US/Allies) * Official Statements & Claims (Iran/Allies) * Civilian & Humanitarian Impact * International Reactions

1. 4. Maintain a 6-Hour Rolling Timeline: Keep a running, time-stamped log of major events. This helps track escalation and the sequence of actions and reactions.